By Mark Pendergrast
for BigTrial.net
Because there are so many alleged Sandusky victims, many of
whom remain anonymous, it's important to look at how the first allegations
against Sandusky developed. Let's look
first at the infamous sodomy-in-the-shower scene, since that is usually
regarded as the most compelling, horrifying evidence. I know that's what convinced me that Sandusky
was guilty when I first heard about the case.
The Sandusky Grand Jury "Presentment" of Nov. 5,
2011, a summary of secret grand jury testimony, stated that, on March 1, 2002,
a Penn State graduate assistant (later identified as Mike McQueary) had gone to
the Lasch Football Building at Penn State around 9:30 p.m. As he entered the locker room, he heard
"rhythmic, slapping sounds" that sounded sexual to him. "He looked in the shower. He saw a naked boy, Victim 2, whose age he
estimated to be ten years old, with his hands up against the wall, being
subjected to anal intercourse by a naked Sandusky."
Because grand jury testimony is supposed to be secret, there
is no available public transcript to show exactly what Mike McQueary said
there, but it is clear from everything else he said about this incident,
including his subsequent courtroom testimony, that he did not witness
sodomy or any other form of sexual abuse that day in the Lasch locker
room. His version of events morphed over
time, but none of the narratives included witnessing overt sexual abuse.
Sandusky took it for granted that boys and men showered together after exercise. It was part of the way he was raised, an accepted part of the sports world. Though he had retired as a Penn State coach two years before, he could still use the facilities, and he sometimes brought the troubled Second Mile boys there for a workout, followed by a shower.
As he often did, Sandusky, whom everyone considered “a big
kid” himself, was goofing around with
the boy. They were snapping towels at each other, or perhaps slap boxing,
according to both Sandusky and the boy in the shower. Mike McQueary, then 26, who had been a Penn
State quarterback as an undergraduate, was halfway through his post-graduate
education, while working as an assistant football coach. This Friday evening, he came to the Lasch
building to retrieve tapes of possible recruits. On the way, he figured he might as well put
his new shoes away in the locker room.
Before he opened the door to the locker room, McQueary heard
slapping sounds. He thought they sounded
sexual. As McQueary later put it when
describing the scene, “Visualizations come to your head.” By the time he got to his locker at the near
end of the wall, it had quieted down. Curious, he looked obliquely into the
shower room through a mirror across the room and caught a glimpse of a boy in
the shower. Then an arm reached out and
pulled the boy back. Horrified, he assumed
that he had just overheard the sounds of child sexual abuse. After closing his locker, he saw Jerry
Sandusky walk out of the shower. Was his former coach a pedophile?
McQueary quickly left the building and called his father,
John McQueary, and told him his suspicions.
His father advised him to come right over to talk about it. Then John McQueary called his employer and
friend, Dr. Jonathan Dranov, a nephrologist, asking him to come over and help
them sort out Mike’s disturbing experience.
Dranov attempted, using the diagnostic and interviewing
skills that he used with patients, to get a clear description of the scene that
had so upset his friend’s son. Dranov
was unable to get Mike McQueary to put into words anything sexual he had seen,
in spite of asking several times, “But what did you see?” McQueary explained
that he had seen a boy in the shower, and that an arm had then reached out to
pull him back. Dranov asked if the boy
had looked scared or upset. No. Did Mike actually see any sexual act? No.
McQueary kept returning to the “sexual” sounds.
Upon the advice of his father and Dr. Dranov, Mike McQueary
took his concerns to legendary head coach Joe Paterno at his home the next day.
Apparently because McQueary did not actually witness anything sexual, they did
not suggest he contact the police, nor did they feel called upon to do so.
This
was the only initiative McQueary ever took connected with the shower
incident. Paterno subsequently told his
immediate supervisor, Athletic Director Tim Curley, about it, who told Vice President
Gary Schultz and university President Graham Spanier. Curley and Schultz met with McQueary to hear
what he had seen and heard. From that
conversation, they concluded that Sandusky had been “horsing around” with a kid
and that, while it was not sexual abuse, it wasn’t a good idea, particularly
because they remembered that a parent had complained back in 1998 about
Sandusky showering with her child (details on that incident shortly).
So Curley told Sandusky that as a result of
someone (he didn’t name McQueary) complaining about the shower incident, he
should stop working out with Second Mile kids on campus, and there the matter
was left, case closed.
McQueary apparently calmed down and accepted that he may
have overreacted and that perhaps Sandusky had
just been “horsing around.” He remained at
least overtly friendly with Jerry Sandusky over the following years. He signed up for the Sandusky Celebrity Golf
Event in the fall of 2001, just four months after the shower incident, then
took part in other Sandusky charity-related events, such as flag football
fund-raisers coached by Sandusky in March 2002 and April 2004 and another golf
event in 2003.
By the time the police questioned McQueary about the shower
incident in late 2010, he couldn’t remember exactly when it occurred, and he
said that it happened during spring break of 2002, more than a year after the
actual date. At the time, McQueary was a 6’ 4”, 220-pound 26-year-old. Some
critics would later question why, if he had witnessed horrifying child sexual
abuse, he would not have rushed in to put a stop to the behavior.
McQueary’s story changed several times after the police told
him that they knew Sandusky was a pedophile,
as we will see in Chapter 12. In response to the police telling him that
Sandusky was a child molester, McQueary searched his decade-old memory and now
“remembered” something that he had not reported back in 2001 -- that he had
seen Sandusky with his hips moving against a boy’s backside in the shower.
In short, Mike McQueary did not witness Jerry Sandusky
sodomizing a 10-year-old boy in the shower, although he later came to believe
that he had. At the time of the
incident, he overheard slapping sounds and interpreted them as being sexual.
We know a great deal more about this incident because we
know the identity of that boy, a Second Miler named Allan Myers, who was nearly
14 years old at the time, not ten, and who remained friends with Sandusky until
after the allegations created a public furor in November 2011. Sandusky later recalled that shower with
Myers in a 2013 interview with reporter John Ziegler:
“He [Allan] turned on every shower [and] he was like wild, he put soap on
himself and was sliding, he was seeing how far he could slide. I remember that. Then we may have been like slapping towels,
slap boxing, doing something like that.”
Here Sandusky laughed, remembering that “he [Allan] always, no matter what, he’d
always get the last lick in."
Recalling his relationship with
Allan Myers, Sandusky said, “He was like family. We did all kinds of things together. We studied.
We tutored. We worked out. He went to California with my wife and me
twice. He spoke for the Second Mile
numerous times.” This all took place
after the 2001 shower incident. “He asked
me to speak at his high school graduation, and I did. He stayed with us the summer after his high
school graduation, worked part-time jobs with classes. He would go home on weekends. We went to his wedding.”
Indeed, Myers, a Marine who had recently received an
honorable discharge at the time the allegations broke, came forward to defend
Sandusky, telling Sandusky’s lawyer and his investigator, Curtis Everhart, what
had actually happened.
Myers, born on
Feb. 28, 1987, had endured his parents’ volatile marriage, in which he
witnessed his father threatening his mother with a gun. His guidance counselor suggested Myers for
the Second Mile program, which he attended as a fourth and fifth grader,
getting to know Jerry Sandusky the second year.
Myers said that Sandusky was a “father figure” associated with “many
positive events” in his life. On “Senior
Night” at a West Branch High School football game, Myers asked Sandusky to walk
out onto the field with his mother, as the loudspeaker announced, “Father,
Jerry Sandusky,” along with his mother’s name.
About the McQueary shower incident, Myers said, "This
particular night is very clear in my mind.”
In the shower after a workout, he and Sandusky "were slapping
towels at each other, trying to sting each other. I would slap the walls and would slide on the
shower floor, which I am sure you could have heard from the wooden locker
area." Myers said that he recalled
hearing a locker slam but he never saw who closed it. Although McQueary would later
claim that both Sandusky and Myers saw him, neither of them had any idea he was
there that night.
Myers repeatedly and emphatically
denied that Jerry Sandusky had ever sexually abused him. “Never, ever, did anything like that
occur.” Yes, Sandusky had put his hand
on his left knee while he was driving, but that didn’t bother him. “I often would stay at Jerry’s home
overnight,” he said. “Jerry never
violated me while I was at his home or anywhere else. On many occasions there were numerous people
at his home. I felt very safe and at
ease at his home, whether alone with Jerry or with others present.”
The only thing that made Myers
feel uncomfortable and violated was his September 2011 interview with
Pennsylvania State Police officers.
“They would try to put words in my mouth, take my statement out of
context. The PSP investigators were
clearly angry and upset when I would not say what they wanted to hear. My final words to the PSP were, ‘I will never
have anything bad to say about Jerry.’”
Allan Myers also wrote a letter to the newspaper and the
Pennsylvania attorney general and submitted a sworn statement to both the
Pennsylvania State Police and a private investigator to the effect that he was
not abused that night or any other time by Jerry Sandusky.
“I am one of those many Second Mile kids who became a part
of Jerry’s ‘family.’ He has been a best
friend, tutor, workout mentor and more,” Myers wrote to the attorney
general. “We’ve worked together,
competed together, traveled together and laughed together. I lived with Jerry and Dottie for three
months. Jerry’s been there for me for 13
years; and stood beside me at my senior parent’s football night. I drove twelve hours to attend his mom’s
funeral. I don’t know what I would have
done without him.”
Myers wrote that letter on May 1, 2011. But like so many Second Milers, Myers subsequently
found a lawyer, Andrew Shubin, and joined the throng of those seeking millions
of dollars in compensation for alleged abuse.
He did not testify at the trial, however. Both prosecution and defense lawyers knew
that Allan Myers was the boy in the 2001 McQueary shower incident, but for
their own strategic reasons, neither chose to identify him, so that the jury
never learned that Myers was in fact the anonymous “Victim Number 2.”
The McQueary story of the alleged sodomy-in-the-shower
became the linchpin of the entire case against Sandusky, lighting a fire under
the investigation and creating a media firestorm, and it is what led to the
firing of Penn State University President Graham Spanier and football Head Coach
Joe Paterno, as well as subsequent lawsuits against Spanier and former Penn
State administrators Gary Schultz and Tim Curley.
Ironically, the sodomy charge of “involuntary
deviate sexual intercourse” in the McQueary incident was among the few for
which the jury found Sandusky not guilty, since the witness did not say that he
had literally seen penetration. The jury
did find Sandusky guilty of four other McQueary-related charges: “indecent assault, unlawful contact with a
minor, corruption of minors and endangering a child's welfare.”
Mike McQueary clearly had a very poor memory of the 2001 shower incident since he got the year and month wrong. The Feb. 9, 2001 shower incident occurred at the end of a very memorable week for PSU football. Feb 7, 2001 was national signing day. On Feb 8, 2001, headlines reported that PSU wide receivers coach, Kenny Jackson, was leaving to coach for the Steelers.
ReplyDeleteMcQueary testified that the first thing Paterno said to him on the phone that Saturday morning (Feb. 10, 2001) was that he had no job for Mike. That was because Paterno suddenly needed a wide receivers coach. Yet McQueary didn't remember why Paterno told him about a job, or he could have quickly determined the exact date. McQueary got the wide receiver position in 2004.
Lawyers for Sandusky, Curley, Schultz and Spanier never questioned McQueary about the Kenny Jackson job opening either to expose McQueary's poor memory.
I trust that Mr Pendergrast realizes that the fraudulent presentment and the janitor hoax was a deliberate stratagem to paint a picture of a little boy being pinned against a wall. This was done to totally prejudice the jury pool, and have the media go wild. The janitor hoax was the mechanism used to drag Joe Paterno and the football program into the fiasco. While Spanier was the target of Corbett's vindictiveness, the collateral damage done to everything PSU must have been very satisfying to Corbett and his cabal. The amount of perjury suborned by Frank Fina alone is epic as well as the conduct of judges who violated every rule of jurisprudence that you can imagine.
ReplyDeleteWith respect to Paterno: No educator is ever allowed to go over the heads of the administrators that he/she is bound to report an alleged incident to. Even had Paterno personally witnessed a questionable circumstance he could not have legally reported it to the police unless the administration refused to act and he specifically knew that someone was being harmed and/or violated. This is less of an indictment of Paterno, and possibly even Sandusky, than it is of a corrupt,sinister, and theatrically oriented media who saw an opportunity to bring down a man whose values are not aligned with the heinous absence of values of today's media.
ReplyDelete